From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20120103080618.GA10149@elte.hu> References: <20120103160813.d2a8575c1de3bad0acd42280@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60733 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985Ab2ACII3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2012 03:08:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120103160813.d2a8575c1de3bad0acd42280@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in kernel/futex.c > between commit e6780f7243ed ("futex: Fix uninterruptible loop due to > gate_area") from the tree and commit ab69f41ef93d ("futex: Fix > uninterruptible loop due to gate_area") from the tip tree. > > OK, so these appear to be 2 different versions of the same > fix. I cannot figure out which to use, so I just used the > version from the tip tree ... No, Linus's version is the correct resolution - i've resolved this in tip:auto-latest. Thanks, Ingo