From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the uprobes tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:04:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20120228053442.GB32211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120228134319.033a60df8db2925d91604c18@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:37394 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752033Ab2B1Fft (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:35:49 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:35:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120228134319.033a60df8db2925d91604c18@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Keniston , Oleg Nesterov Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the uprobes tree got a conflict in > kernel/fork.c between commit d80e731ecab4 ("epoll: introduce POLLFREE to > flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree()") from Linus' tree and commit > 1f9eb65410a6 ("uprobes/core: handle breakpoint and signal step > exception") from the uprobes tree. > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. Okay, Thanks for letting me know. I will fix this up accordingly.