linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
@ 2012-03-01  2:56 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-03-01  3:01 ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-01  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]

Hi Dave,

After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)

Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
DVFS response latency").

I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
  2012-03-01  2:56 linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-03-01  3:01 ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2012-03-01  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:56:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 > Hi Dave,
 > 
 > After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
 > allmodconfig) failed like this:
 > 
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
 > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > 
 > Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
 > DVFS response latency").
 > 
 > I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.

gah, this patch was dependant upon another that didn't apply cleanly.

	Dave

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
@ 2012-03-05  1:46 MyungJoo Ham
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: MyungJoo Ham @ 2012-03-05  1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Dave Jones
  Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	박경민, "RafaelJ.Wysocki<rjw",
	linux-pm

Hello,

The patch "CPUfreq ondemand: handle QoS request on DVFS response latency" that introduced the mentioned errors requires the patch "PM / QoS: Introduce new classes: DMA-Throughput and DVFS-Latency" get merged, too. I guess that patch will be at pm-qos tree if get merged (v2 patch has been released 7 days ago).


Cheers!
MyungJoo.

------- Original Message -------
Sender : Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date : 2012-03-01 11:56 (GMT+09:00)
Title : linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree

Hi Dave,

After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)

Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
DVFS response latency").

I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/



--
MyungJoo Ham (함명주), PHD
System S/W Lab, S/W Platform Team, Software Center
Samsung Electronics
Cell: +82-10-6714-2858

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-05  1:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-01  2:56 linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-01  3:01 ` Dave Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-05  1:46 MyungJoo Ham

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).