From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix build failure for regulator consumer in em-x270.c
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:54:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120329145436.GS3668@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F7471A0.6070208@compulab.co.il>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:28:48PM +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 03/28/12 18:59, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>> static struct platform_device em_x270_gps_userspace_consumer = {
> >>> .name = "reg-userspace-consumer",
> >>> .id = 0,
> >>> static struct platform_device em_x270_gprs_userspace_consumer = {
> >>> .name = "reg-userspace-consumer",
> >>> .id = 1,
> > -REGULATOR_CONSUMER(ldo19, "reg-userspace-consumer", "vcc gprs");
> > +REGULATOR_CONSUMER(ldo19, "reg-userspace-consumer.1", "vcc gprs");
> Well, I thought of this solution, but I don't like it, as it makes
> the whole thing very fragile and sensitive to the reg-userspace-consumer
> platform device registration order and count, isn't it?
> (That's why I proposed to use NULL...).
No the platform device numbering should be totally stable for a given
board unless someone deliberately sets out to renumber them - the .ids
are explicitly assigned by the board when it registers the device.
> So, Mark, how do you think the above issues can be handled without
> putting NULL into the dev_name?
It shouldn't be a problem I think.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 23:12 [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix build failure for regulator consumer in em-x270.c Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 8:46 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-03-06 9:12 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-06 12:16 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 12:22 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-07 0:10 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-08 22:06 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-28 15:21 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-03-28 15:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 15:37 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-28 15:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 15:59 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-28 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 16:59 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-29 14:28 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-03-29 14:54 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-03-29 14:57 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-29 15:11 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-29 14:55 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-30 11:25 ` Igor Grinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120329145436.GS3668@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).