From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:48:06 +1000 Message-ID: <20120411144806.7664d38b@notabene.brown> References: <20120411134259.61f755a90055b23a6876687b@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_//zSAz9FQY5pWkpGQyz.Abta"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60148 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929Ab2DKEsQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:48:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120411134259.61f755a90055b23a6876687b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Kukunas , "H. Peter Anvin" --Sig_//zSAz9FQY5pWkpGQyz.Abta Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:42:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Neil, >=20 > After merging the md tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >=20 > lib/raid6/recov.c: In function 'raid6_has_ssse3': > lib/raid6/recov.c:27:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'boot_cpu= _has' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > lib/raid6/recov.c:27:22: error: 'X86_FEATURE_XMM' undeclared (first use i= n this function) > lib/raid6/recov.c:27:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported onl= y once for each function it appears in > lib/raid6/recov.c:28:16: error: 'X86_FEATURE_XMM2' undeclared (first use = in this function) > lib/raid6/recov.c:29:16: error: 'X86_FEATURE_SSSE3' undeclared (first use= in this function) > lib/raid6/recov.c: At top level: > lib/raid6/recov.c:25:12: warning: 'raid6_has_ssse3' defined but not used = [-Wunused-function] >=20 > Caused by commit 56d3ac7ef905 ("lib/raid6: Add SSSE3 optimized recovery > functions"). All the world is not X86 :-) >=20 > I have used the md tree from next-20120410 for today. Thanks Stephen, I've removed that set of patches from my for-next pending further review and revision. Thanks, NeilBrown --Sig_//zSAz9FQY5pWkpGQyz.Abta Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBT4UNBjnsnt1WYoG5AQIu5Q//fozzyiSS+Uo0qcUU664Ux0igMWbMQ0JA p7q5U8r6If2Hwbid4JaV33uyu3Fs9sd1QYydlDNu7V+u8oKoxORZQeuom15J1aww cTlR/NbMtD390Dt6m1isfrhd706b5CwuLV19NXtQpo8o4Nxzw5QTEs+GfU2qn4lx NrLoaWVRE+PxJ1Ohml+rUnpBmXV+vMcvPQBkarYWjoO3+f3//WqgVWtdoo4Rr8dM ZgLT8wWpONExrbrpsFgKvDKa7UQH8pNxdIohy8ZZyUDwHb5X520ReBfNDCX2NbXX wV3q4mn3KuBdX1pDDc6vVAYFmGldUiVNtAvt1Tk+JLG8ZceQwfesc1a16sDs/F93 tJ1VVnltUvnOtWJA8H1IyDbnjtdndIt0r9VRxiiItKu9roOzWAccOMCgzi4ujkHX 3nOEFA/e56/UzfyaLKXaKNEk0nKk1GNBQMZ5akrfPzw4pmIN6tSeZrdotl4Gng7c YQifa/EjyFAxnyNRXfZtKdg9cCbKQOxTcNU4VtC4cwtx38wCXz8SBDpDhExHVVmA bYILMjOdXhrDpnB5wBj5HgZUdamEJT63N5d0JU7gz2YNwc84U0ZMg9Isab5iPq0f 9NsF+l1HIyr4vo4PRSNSVEnoIgYBx+rIrJUuKQWDm/eYV8YLie8f6hPKyFwzBTjQ oQp1DZyNNkc= =o7yP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//zSAz9FQY5pWkpGQyz.Abta--