Re: linux-next: "amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support" commit.

Mark Brown
2012-04-13T11:25:51Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:44:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I did say we should've been pushing Shawn's patch in as a minimal fix
> > for 3.4...

> What patch?

The original one which just changed the return code that's checked for.

> > Regardless of what happens for 3.4 we should keep the removal for -next,
> > it's clear that we don't want the bus doing this and it's causing
> > breakage for the non-ST platforms. Do I need to resend the patch to the
> > patch system or will the existing copy be OK?

> What I want is something that doesn't cause a regression for 3.4.

Well, if the overall result is something other than removing the code in
3.5 then we'll just get further regressions down the line.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]