From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:35:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120502.213532.2065398707446945634.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120503113110.3eded43c5dc526a471c69dd2@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:38541 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753461Ab2ECBim (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 21:38:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120503113110.3eded43c5dc526a471c69dd2@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok@cozybit.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 11:31:10 +1000 > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in > net/wireless/nl80211.c between commit 9360ffd18597 ("wireless: Stop using > NLA_PUT*()") from the net-next tree and commit 0a9b3782ef40 ("{nl,cfg,mac} > 80211: Allow user to see/configure HT protection mode") from the > wireless-next tree. John, the NLA_PUT macros were removed from the net-next tree more than a month ago. There is zero reason why this should still be happening, and this issue is causing a large, unnecessary, burdon upon Stephen. Please take care of this, thanks.