From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the input tree Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 14:49:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20120503214943.GB16912@kroah.com> References: <20120503144421.bce525fdec4a9b2d3b7557d5@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50327 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754455Ab2ECVtq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 17:49:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120503144421.bce525fdec4a9b2d3b7557d5@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Chris Bagwell On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:44:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > drivers/input/tablet/wacom_wac.c between commit eb71d1bb270e ("Input: > wacom - use dev_xxx() instead of naked printk()s and dbg()s") from the > input tree and commit 3b6aee237e88 ("USB: wacom: remove dbg() usage") > from the usb tree. > > I just used the input tree's version (which used "input->dev.parent" > instead of "&input->dev"). That's fine, Dmitry and I are still "discussing" which pointer is best to use on lkml, but either is good for the merge :) thanks, greg k-h