From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 23:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120515.235747.716576574995746023.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120516134430.14f8e43c6f75604410dae815@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:45005 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716Ab2EPEAp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120516134430.14f8e43c6f75604410dae815@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: mmarek@suse.cz, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:44:30 +1000 > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in > arch/sparc/boot/Makefile between commit 51f19cfa76d7 ("sparc32: drop > build time btfixup patching") from the sparc-next tree and commit > 95698570510b ("kbuild: refactor final link of sparc32") from the kbuild > tree. > > I have no idea, so I used the version from the sparc-next tree. > > Sam, can you have a look and work this out, please? As Sam states in: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/159094/ This patch will conflict badly with a patch in kbuild-next. The fix is simple - drop all changes from kbuild-next. :-)