From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:25:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20120601152504.GA25384@ericsson.com> References: <1337890738-26533-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20120524205426.GW3074@spo001.leaseweb.com> <1338307894.478.68.camel@groeck-laptop> <4FC8C5B3.2060108@redhat.com> <20120601160657.3b93393c@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from imr4.ericy.com ([198.24.6.9]:58801 "EHLO imr4.ericy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964838Ab2FAP1f (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:27:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120601160657.3b93393c@endymion.delvare> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jean Delvare Cc: Hans de Goede , Wim Van Sebroeck , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , LM Sensors On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:06:57AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:37:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Now that we've a common watchdog core, I would also like to convert the > > fschmd watchdog code to it (one of these days). Which raises the question > > through which tree should that conversion go in. fschmd is primarily a hwmon > > driver, but the changes will only touch the watchdog part... > > > > I guess it would be best to get the conversion in to Wim's tree, even though > > that slightly increases the chance of conflicts. The fschmd driver does not see > > a lot of churn, and I think Wim is a better reviewer for watchdog related > > patches :) > > Chances of conflicts are so thin, I vote for getting it through Wim's > watchdog tree. > Ok with me. Guenter