From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: nfs root problem in linux-next Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:53:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20120629145332.GA11745@localhost> References: <1340656006.20557.30.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <1340666049.4362.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1340680664.20557.38.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <1340978148.2498.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1340981329.2514.23.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:45239 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752207Ab2F2Oxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:53:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1340981329.2514.23.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" , linux-next , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:48:48AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 13:55 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > > Hi Mark and Fengguang, > > > > I believe that I've found the bug that was being triggered in the > > above > > patch. It was a mistake in the earlier patch "SUNRPC: Don't decode > > beyond the end of the RPC reply message", which was failing to > > correctly > > initialise the xdr->nwords field. > > > > I've now fixed it and updated the linux-next branch. > > Yes, I can confirm that today's linux-next is booting correctly > for me on an nfsroot. > > Thanks! I can confirm it, too. Thanks!