From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs for linux-next
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:26:53 -0400
Message-ID: <20121002122653.GB1140@shiny>
References: <20120930115258.GA13506@shiny>
 <20121001181549.817cc2d7d0d660eb593922fd@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20121002013618.GA1140@shiny>
 <20121002125436.a39101ab6f87d4e8596c1031@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.30]:37670 "EHLO mx1.fusionio.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752342Ab2JBM04 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:26:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121002125436.a39101ab6f87d4e8596c1031@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Chris Mason <clmason@fusionio.com>, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:54:36PM -0600, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:36:18 -0400 Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the hassle, we've updated that patch and rebased the tree:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next
> 
> Looks good today.
> 
> I am not sure if you are aware of exactly how linux-next works:  I will
> fetch that branch of your tree every morning, so any changes will be
> automatically incorporated into linux-next.

Thanks! I knew you'd pull again but wanted to send an explicit ack that
we had fixed up the first pull.

-chris