From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 03:11:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20121030101140.18780.69840@nucleus> References: <20121030150627.ac1f6a3f75231ea49edf7b98@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121030150627.ac1f6a3f75231ea49edf7b98@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Pawel Moll , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2012-10-29 21:06:27) > Hi Mike, > > Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h between commit 0891642cf117 ("ARM: > vexpress: Start using new Versatile Express infrastructure") from the > arm-soc tree and commit 05e3659135a4 ("clk: Common clocks implementation > for Versatile Express") from the clk tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > > diff --cc arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h > index 2cdcf44,afd7e91..0000000 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/sp810.h > @@@ -50,6 -50,14 +50,8 @@@ > #define SCPCELLID2 0xFF8 > #define SCPCELLID3 0xFFC > > -#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_REFCLK (0 << 15) > -#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 15) > - > -#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_REFCLK (0 << 17) > -#define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 17) > - > + #define SCCTRL_TIMERENnSEL_SHIFT(n) (15 + ((n) * 2)) > + > static inline void sysctl_soft_reset(void __iomem *base) > { > /* switch to slow mode */ Pawel, Does this look OK for you? Thanks, Mike