From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 00:17:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20130108081735.GB19691@intel.com> References: <20130108093557.8a29d4a04b95702fc59790ff@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:30486 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754784Ab3AHIlv (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 03:41:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130108093557.8a29d4a04b95702fc59790ff@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , Greg Kroah-Hartman On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), Yes due to build conflict I redid the rebase of my tree. > an instance of > __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG > always true, and since commit 78d86c213f28 ("init.h: Remove __dev* > sections from the kernel") (included in v3.7), __devinit does nothing. > Please do not add any more. I think I was trying to remove it. Anyway I have changed the commit to remove this and also another instance. So you should be happy about it :) > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au