From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:54:47 +0000 Message-ID: <201302251454.47617.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1360849767-1463135-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20130222101359.0c91a7259f648a3d06221bd8@canb.auug.org.au> <512B72A7.6040307@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:64127 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756044Ab3BYOzM (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:55:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <512B72A7.6040307@synopsys.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Stephen Rothwell , James Hogan , Andrew Morton , arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Monday 25 February 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Have you queued up this change via one of your trees already for 3.9-rcX ? > If not, I can fold it in with a bunch of Kconfig cleanups for ARC > (GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK, HAVE_IRQ_WORK), given that those bits are already in linus' > tree. > I haven't put it in my tree yet, not. Please put it in yours. Arnd