From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the workqueues tree Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:51:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20130313205147.GB22267@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20130313154905.59d00adb5b62d5169649aea0@canb.auug.org.au> <20130313124624.1d51184d95d2c69c37daad0d@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:37052 "EHLO mail-ob0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933178Ab3CMUvx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:51:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130313124624.1d51184d95d2c69c37daad0d@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Andrew. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:46:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Tejun, can you please confirm that this is how worker_pool_assign_id() > should look in linux-next? > > static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool) > { > int ret; > > do { > idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); > spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock); > ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_NOWAIT); > if (ret >= 0) > pool->id = ret; > spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock); idr_preload_end(); > } while (ret == -EAGAIN); > > return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; > } Other than that, it looks good to me. Thanks! -- tejun