From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:36:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20130321233614.GA9125@kroah.com> References: <5149D1FD.90400@suse.cz> <20130320151511.170EC8017A@viridian.itc.virginia.edu> <20130321001628.GC27981@kroah.com> <20130322095423.799b201fd0f6671e8127c2ac@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:44526 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754055Ab3CUXgR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:36:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130322095423.799b201fd0f6671e8127c2ac@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Bill Pemberton , Jiri Slaby , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:54:23AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:16:28 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:15:11AM -0400, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > > Jiri Slaby writes: > > > > > > > > On 03/20/2013 03:42 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > > > > > > > Asking Greg to revert should suffice. I commented on that patch, but in > > > > a different thread, so Greg missed the comment the patch is not needed > > > > IIRC. What was the title of the patch, I cannot find it immediately :/? > > > > > > "USB: quatech2: only write to the tty if the port is open." (commit > > > 27b351c in v3.9-rc3). > > > > I've now reverted this, so it should be ok. > > That patch needed to be reverted in your tty tree, not your usb tree > since it breaks a patch added to your tty tree (see Subject). Ah, ok, I've done that now, sorry for the confusion. greg k-h