From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 21:43:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20130703214300.11d9223a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20130704143353.e695ca64b17705c842676870@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43050 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751508Ab3GDEm4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jul 2013 00:42:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130704143353.e695ca64b17705c842676870@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yaakov Selkowitz , Michal Marek , Daniel Tang On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in > tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h > between commit b35310627f39 ("tools/include: use stdint types for > user-space byteshift headers") from the kbuild tree and commit > "scripts/sortextable.c: fix building on non-Linux systems" from the > akpm tree. > > As fas as I can tell, these patches do the same thing except one uses > stdint.h and the other inttypes.h. I just dropped the akpm tree patch. Well OK, but new patches really shouldn't be popping up in the middle of the merge window like this. AFAICT Yaakov (re)sent this patch way back in April, so it should have been in -next for a long time. Something has gone wrong here.