From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the drivers-x86 tree Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:17:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20130715191708.GA514@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130711100437.4e5198a27a72dcdd3f69200f@canb.auug.org.au> <20130715101306.6d6fc3cb42ce956130606ac2@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:57124 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754190Ab3GOTRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:17:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130715101306.6d6fc3cb42ce956130606ac2@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:13:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > That is hardly a reason to rebase your tree. Just add another commit to > correct the situation. The tree as it stood would not have affected > anyone's building, running or bisecting. I verified that the only difference before and after rebasing was that the file permission was back the way it should be. Why clutter history? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org