From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:41:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20130910154116.cc4afe048213a779040ea3cc@linux-foundation.org> References: <20130910143807.4c32d548e08d2184061f52cb@canb.auug.org.au> <20130910152753.662599171456233c5f91edb4@linux-foundation.org> <20130910222924.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130910153520.14e49cd32feb16d45eb8abac@linux-foundation.org> <20130910223624.GC13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40193 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336Ab3IJWlR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:41:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130910223624.GC13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Dave Chinner , Glauber Costa On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:36:24 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:35:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:29:24 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:27:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > This is rather a fiasco. "vfs: reorganize dput() memory accesses" made > > > > rather a mess of a 46 patch series which has been under development and > > > > test for two cycles so far. > > > > > > Check vfs.git#for-next... > > > > Why? What is in it? > > Initial attempt to port that very thing on top of current mainline. Obtained from where? There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from review and linux-next testing. Are they included?