From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:44:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20130910154400.75bb3328fbb9eaa937715652@linux-foundation.org> References: <20130910143807.4c32d548e08d2184061f52cb@canb.auug.org.au> <20130910152753.662599171456233c5f91edb4@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40199 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751420Ab3IJWoB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:44:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Chinner , Al Viro On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:35:04 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I'd (once again) suggest you base your pile of patches on the > previous stable kernel, and that linux-next take it *first* rather > than take it last. That's what we're now doing. But this particular patchset was different because it's changing multiple subsystems, several of which are concurrently being changed in an uncoordinated fashion.