From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600
Message-ID: <20130925072729.351516b9@lwn.net>
References: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:58086 "EHLO vena.lwn.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754612Ab3IYN1f (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:27:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> jc_docs		2 years, 6 months ago

I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)

I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps getting in the way.  If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
days...

Thanks,

jon