From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 19:39:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20131108023901.GE10212@kernel.dk> References: <5273C473.5070803@kernel.dk> <20131102072252.88d2380fa392705b912dbfad@canb.auug.org.au> <52740EB1.2070901@kernel.dk> <527411DD.7050008@oracle.com> <527414DE.9090704@kernel.dk> <52756583.2030808@oracle.com> <527BE7FA.90904@oracle.com> <20131107192545.GA20624@moria.home.lan> <527C2AA9.9040608@oracle.com> <20131108125307.613427c04a7527c4359e6443@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131108125307.613427c04a7527c4359e6443@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Kleikamp , Kent Overstreet , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zach Brown , Olof Johansson , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 08 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:04:57 -0600 Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > > > Can you please drop the aio-direct tree for the time being? > > OK, I was afraid of this, but, yes, I can drop it. I am not quite sure > what affect this will have on Andrew's tree, though (hopefully not too > much). > > This is a bit disappointing. Dave's stuff have been sitting in > linux-next for quite some time (probably too long) so it is not as if > Kent and Jens (should) have been unaware of it. If it doesn't throw merge errors for you, I am not aware of it. -- Jens Axboe