From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:30:08 -0700 Message-ID: <20140319153008.GC31293@kroah.com> References: <20140317185542.fe4554210fc1893b44289008@canb.auug.org.au> <20140317080122.459ff9d4@infradead.org> <20140317182953.GA10565@kroah.com> <20140317162937.2ccdec83@infradead.org> <20140317222736.GB3708@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:59557 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965071AbaCSP2G (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:28:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140317222736.GB3708@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , Sylwester Nawrocki , Laurent Pinchart , Grant Likely , Mauro Carvalho Chehab On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27:36PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > However, I still find myself coming back to a fundamental question: why > were these bindings fine in April 2013, passed review, and were acked, > but not fine today. Here's the links to the emails acking their > introduction which Sylwester Nawrocki sent me: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg61899.html > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg62458.html > > So... *shrug*. Make of this what you will. Thanks for the details, I'll just leave my tree as-is for now, as that seems the simplest thing to do. greg k-h