From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20140407112654.e2172fd7c0df975bf79df388@linux-foundation.org> References: <20140407145242.1958251349e0b6c6c8923f46@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38569 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755832AbaDGS04 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:26:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140407145242.1958251349e0b6c6c8923f46@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits': > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits(bit_off, num_bits); > ^ > > I have no idea how to track this down :-( The only patches affecting this > code are now in Linus' tree. I can only assume that some implicitly > included header file is no longer included. I have just left it broken > for now. I can't reproduce this with either mainline or linux-next. Pulled half an hour ago, powerpc allyesconfig.