From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:25:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20140417052500.GZ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20140417150657.6d67e750081860b30f99715c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59236 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752589AbaDQFZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2014 01:25:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140417150657.6d67e750081860b30f99715c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:06:57PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got a conflict in > fs/namespace.c between various commits from Linus' tree and various > commits from the userns tree. > > I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary > (no action is required). Various commits include this: commit 38129a13e6e71f666e0468e99fdd932a687b4d7e Author: Al Viro Date: Thu Mar 20 21:10:51 2014 -0400 switch mnt_hash to hlist present in v3.14... It's been there since before the merge window.