From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 15:49:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20140526074913.GD2650@dragon> References: <20140526154331.7fc6b30c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140526154331.7fc6b30c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cosmin Stoica , Xiubo Li List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:43:31PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Today's linux-next merge of the clockevents tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi between commit 0517fe6aa880 ("ARM: dts: > vf610-twr: Add support for sdhc1") from the arm-soc tree and commit > 07513e1330a9 ("ARM: dts: vf610: Add Freescale FlexTimer Module timer > node") from the clockevents tree. Next time, please leave the dts patches to go via arch tree, so that we can save such conflicts. Shawn