Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-16T21:53:01Z

Hi Eric,

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:36:59 -0400 Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Thu, 16 Jul
> > 2015 14:58:53 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] mm: mlock: fix for add new
> > mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/calls.S
> > | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h index 32640c431a08..2516c09d65d7
> > 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h +++
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ * This may need
> > to be greater than __NR_last_syscall+1 in order to * account for
> > the padding in the syscall table */ -#define __NR_syscalls (388)
> > +#define __NR_syscalls (392)
>
> IIUC, this should be 391.

Read the comment above - it has to be 392 for padding. (I actually
tried 391 and it fails to build.)

BTW, what mail client are you using - it really made a mess :-(

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au