From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:11:23 +0900 Message-ID: <20140904171123.GD26364@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20140901230728.GM29327@sirena.org.uk> <1627064.QhxvejlWdk@amdc1032> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:62198 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751228AbaIDRLa (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:11:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Russell King , Kyungmin Park On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Subject: irqchip: Properly fetch the per cpu offset > > The raw_cpu_read() conversion dropped the fetch of the offset > from base->percpu_base in gic_get_percpu_base. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter > > Index: linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > +++ linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX > #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED > static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base) > { > - return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base); > + return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base); I suppose this should go through percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops? Can we please cc irq folks and get acks? Thanks. -- tejun