public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: New platform-drivers-x86 tree
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:46:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908104657.0743df3a@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140903191807.GE29327@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2008 bytes --]

Hi Darren,

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:18:07 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:21:20PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > 
> > I searched the documentation (development-process/*) but found the linux-next
> > wiki to be down (for a while now it seems). Apologies if I'm missing something
> > documented there.
> 
> This is pretty much the process.  Stephen's on holiday this week, I've
> updated the configuration for the trees I'm building this week but you
> might want to check that this gets carried over when he's back on
> Monday.

I have updated my config files as well.

> > I have subscribed to the linux-next mailing list. Is there more I need to be
> > doing? Do I need to send you pull requests, or do you pull a list of branches
> > automatically?
> 
> It's all done automatically - for-next will be fetched for each -next
> build.  Stephen's form letter for this can be found in the archives, the
> main rule is that you should only be putting code there intended to go
> in during the merge window.

What Mark said :-)

The only other thing is the following legalese:

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-08  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-03  5:21 linux-next: New platform-drivers-x86 tree Darren Hart
2014-09-03 19:18 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-08  0:46   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140908104657.0743df3a@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox