Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Josh,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tiny tree got a conflict in
> kernel/time/Makefile between commit fd866e2b116b ("time: Rename
> udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c") from the tip tree and commit
> d1f6d68d03ea ("kernel: time: Compile out NTP support") from the tiny
> tree.

So I think a timer subsystem commit d1f6d68d03ea with this 
magnitude of linecount increase:

 Signed-off-by: Catalina Mocanu <catalina.mocanu@gmail.com>
 [josh: Handle CONFIG_COMPAT=y.]
 Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
 Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
 ---
  drivers/pps/Kconfig        |  2 +-
  include/linux/timex.h      | 15 +++++++++++++--
  init/Kconfig               | 10 ++++++++++
  kernel/compat.c            |  8 ++++++--
  kernel/sys_ni.c            |  4 ++++
  kernel/time/Makefile       |  3 ++-
  kernel/time/ntp_internal.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  kernel/time/posix-timers.c |  2 ++
  kernel/time/time.c         |  2 ++
  kernel/time/timekeeping.c  |  2 ++
  10 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

at minimum needs the ack of timer folks, before it can be 
committed to Git. Or is the tiny tree plan to submit all
patches to the appropriate subsystem or gather acks, before 
sending it upstream?

Thanks,

	Ingo