From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pm, mfd and regulator trees Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:49:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20141127084902.GC4628@x1> References: <20141126154406.434ab873@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141126154406.434ab873@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Grant Likely , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pantelis Antoniou , Romain Perier List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org > Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in > include/linux/of.h between commits b31384fa5de3 ("Driver core: Unifie= d > device properties interface for platform firmware") from the pm tree > and a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability"= ) > from the mfd and regulator trees and commit 7518b5890d8a ("of/overlay= : > Introduce DT overlay support") from the devicetree tree. This patch actually originated from the Regulator tree. I pulled it in to avoid conflicts between MFD and Regulator. I guess OF needs to do the same to avoid a conflict when Linus pulls them in. [...] --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog