From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the watchdog tree Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:02:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20141215170227.GC2155@kroah.com> References: <20141215141114.575b8767@canb.auug.org.au> <20141215043506.GB3949@kroah.com> <20141215160909.24c2e73b@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:43940 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750979AbaLORCb (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:02:31 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A121920ADE for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:02:28 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141215160909.24c2e73b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiubo Li , Wolfram Sang On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:09:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:35:06 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > > > > How is this happening, nothing has changed in my trees, did something > > new get added to the watchdog tree? > > Yep. > > It would have been much easier on me (and maybe Linus) if those "drop > owner assignment from platform_drivers" patches had gone via their > respective maintainers ... just something to remember for next time. Yeah, sorry, I'll do that next time, my fault. greg k-h