From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:26:31 -0500
Message-ID: <20150206152631.06ceb1f5@gandalf.local.home>
References: <CA+icZUWB6XHvOxV-_b=m=c1-RvE3FVbeDeih__zZbZ23dVVJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150206152158.6ff17514@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUUYffGg1Xkbc+R4jpuA-CZr1RF_=CWfKiNyLqnQ0KnpGw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay0066.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.66]:56401 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751877AbbBFU0g (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:26:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUUYffGg1Xkbc+R4jpuA-CZr1RF_=CWfKiNyLqnQ0KnpGw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:23:13 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
> > Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >> >
> >>
> >> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
> >>
> >
> > But I wanted "To Be Loved".
> >
> 
> Sorry, the patch is not "applicable" :-)

How about, I wanted "x86 to be loved by trace"? Or vice versa.

Applicable then?

-- Steve