From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20150206161803.30cdd90e@gandalf.local.home> References: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0179.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.179]:36681 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755221AbbBFVSH (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sedat Dilek Cc: LKML , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dave Hansen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:07:56 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote: > Your patchset fixes the issue for me (look at the attached files for > more detailed information). So I can add your Tested-by tag? > > I tested the "To Be Loved" (TBL VS. TLB flushes) edition against > Linux-next (next-20150204) where I had originally seen and reported > the call-trace. > > Before I forget... The Fixes-tag misses pointing to Dave Hansen's... > > commit d17d8f9dedb9dd76fd540a5c497101529d9eb25a > "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes" Sure, I can add that, and even Cc stable for 3.17+. > > My POV is that both patches somehow belong together. > If you decide to push them through two different trees, please add a > note/reference to each other. The second patch should reference the first one. But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree. -- Steve