From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:24:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20150206162445.2bdbc0da@gandalf.local.home> References: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org> <20150206161803.30cdd90e@gandalf.local.home> <20150206161924.53c88aae@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150206161924.53c88aae@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sedat Dilek Cc: LKML , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dave Hansen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:19:24 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:03 -0500 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which > > could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to > > tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the > > first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree. > > > > I may as well just push the first patch directly to Linus, as it does > fix false positives. > Heh, the first patch actually will be marked as fixing another patch by Dave Hansen: 3a630178fd5f3 -- Steve