From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace
 code on offline CPU
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:04:45 -0500
Message-ID: <20150206180445.7e3aa6d1@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org>
	<CA+icZUVvnOA9O0GMDangTLATPOHU=Do5Kj-fo0bVu5Wfb0TT7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150206213856.GN5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUWBJ5-0pyreVdTduaOPg8StccZhcu6=vdD_Zny8CCMZDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150206173548.48f53ed7@gandalf.local.home>
	<20150206224836.GU5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay0130.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.130]:40565 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751776AbbBFXEs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:04:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20150206224836.GU5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:48:36 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:35:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:13:02 +0100
> > Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > OK, so both patches go through Steve's tree.
> > 
> > The second patch will require acks from those that maintain the files I
> > touch.
> 
> Yep, that is required either way.  I will give it an Acked-by in the hope
> that this helps.  You have another version on the way, or have I lost
> count?  ;-)
> 

It's this patch series that's my latest version. I just need the second
patch acked. You could ack the first one as well if you want, but it's
not that necessary.

I would really like an ack from Dave Hansen for the second patch, and
perhaps hpa as well.

-- Steve