From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150207200948.GA5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150207102002.4edc054c@grimm.local.home>
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > - Tested-by's
> > - Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
>
> The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
> not need to reference each other.
>
> > - CC: stable v3.17+/v3.18+ ? (1/2 has a hint for backporting in case
> > of 3.17+ which is BTW EOL, not sure if there are main distros
> > supporting linux-3.17.y)
>
> The first patch fixes a bug introduced in 3.18. There would be no splat
> in 3.17 because the check didn't exist then. But the RCU reference
> while cpu offline (second bug) was introduced in 3.17 and that is what
> the second patch fixes.
>
> >
> > BTW, do you happen to know if there is a someting like a
> > "Requires-tag" or "Precondition-tag" (for example the Fixes-tag is
> > very helpful)?
>
> We don't need more tags.
>
> > AFAICS people place such information into the commit-message.
> > I have seen "References:" but this is more to point to a
> > bug-tracking-system (BTS).
> >
> > EXAMPLE:
> >
> > commit 63b03e2d2477586440741677ecac45bcf28d7b1
> > "mutex: Always clear owner field upon mutex_unlock()"
> >
> > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
> >
>
> I may add that, but more appropriate would be to add the commit that
> fixes the bug to the bug report.
>
> > Maybe ask godfather of SubmittingPatches greg-kh?
>
> Heh, I haven't read that document in years.
Given my confusion about stable tags, I read stable_kernel_rules.txt
the other day, and found this:
- If the patch requires other patches as prerequisites which can be
cherry-picked, then this can be specified in the following format in
the sign-off area:
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: 1b9508f: sched: Rate-limit newidle
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: fd21073: sched: Fix affinity logic
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
git cherry-pick a1f84a3
git cherry-pick 1b9508f
git cherry-pick fd21073
git cherry-pick <this commit>
Does that do what you need?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-07 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 20:06 [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 20:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 23:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-07 4:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-07 8:01 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-07 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-07 19:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-07 20:09 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-02-07 20:14 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-07 21:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-07 22:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-07 23:01 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-07 23:48 ` Dave Hansen
2015-02-07 8:13 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-07 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 21:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 21:21 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-06 22:13 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 22:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-06 22:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 23:02 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 23:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-06 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-06 20:11 [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 20:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 20:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 21:39 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-02-06 21:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-06 22:32 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150207200948.GA5418@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox