From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the backlight tree Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:45:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20150527074511.GR11677@x1> References: <20150527131118.6e3ef667@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:34854 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbbE0HpQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 03:45:16 -0400 Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so101439017wic.0 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 00:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150527131118.6e3ef667@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomeu Vizoso On Wed, 27 May 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the backlight tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >=20 > drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c: In function 'of_find_backlight_b= y_node': > drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c:563:2: error: implicit declaratio= n of function 'of_platform_device_ensure' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-= declaration] > of_platform_device_ensure(node); > ^ >=20 > Caused by commit 67a6b10546ea ("backlight: Probe backlight devices on > demand"). Yes, I need to remove that commit. Thanks for letting me know. > I have used the backlight tree from next-20150526 for today. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog