From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the modules and tip trees
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:03:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528170321.GH5989@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528172507.31f6fc8c@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> c1ad348b452a ("tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation") from the tip
> tree and commits 7d0ae8086b82 ("rcu: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to
> READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()") and 3382adbc1bb8 ("rcu: Eliminate a few
> CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL #ifdefs") from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Thank you, Stephen!
Ingo, I can send you a pull request as is or I can merge c1ad348b452a
with v4.1-rc3, rebase my commits on top of that, and do another cycle
through -next. If I don't hear otherwise, I will be lazy and send as is,
so if you would prefer something different, please let me know.
Thanx, Paul
> I also had to add this merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:20:58 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: merge fix for Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to READ_ONCE() and
> WRITE_ONCE()
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index ba91e5c88a32..f7e7235f3a91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
> */
> #define lockless_dereference(p) \
> ({ \
> - typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> + typeof(p) _________p1 = READ_ONCE(p); \
> smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> (_________p1); \
> })
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index ed5f66464ab3,3a4d1bf430b1..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@@ -1140,13 -1063,13 +1050,13 @@@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unl
> #define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head) \
> __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
>
> - #if defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
> + #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
> -static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
> +static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
> {
> - *delta_jiffies = ULONG_MAX;
> + *nextevt = KTIME_MAX;
> return 0;
> }
> - #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL) */
> + #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
> static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return true; }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 7:25 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the modules and tip trees Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-28 17:03 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-05-29 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-29 12:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-24 0:09 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528170321.GH5989@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).