From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 21:27:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20150608042733.GA34635@fury.dvhart.com> References: <20150604181308.16fbe6cf@canb.auug.org.au> <20150604175135.GA10262@potion.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150604175135.GA10262@potion.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:51:36PM +0200, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 w= rote: > 2015-06-04 18:13+1000, Stephen Rothwell: > > After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_6= 4 allmodconfig) > > failed like this: > >=20 > > ERROR: "acpi_bus_get_status_handle" [drivers/platform/x86/pvpanic.k= o] undefined! > >=20 > > Caused by commit b8f8cf6b02b6 ("pvpanic: handle missing _STA correc= tly"). >=20 > Classic, I only built with Y, sorry. While I, as a rule, build with both. My apologies for letting this slip= through into -next. >=20 > acpi_bus_get_status_handle is not exported, so a simple solution woul= d > be to make it so. Or it's possible to rewrite the patch in a way tha= t > uses current infrastructure. >=20 > Would you prefer a patch to export it, a build fix on top of > b8f8cf6b02b6 or a replacement patch? I'll take the incremental below, but I will roll it into the existing o= ne so as not to break bisectability in Linus tree. Thanks, --=20 Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center