public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Chris Zhong" <zyw@rock-chips.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rk808: make better use of the gpiod API
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:04:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721110415.GS11162@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda5DrDx77514uBT+3-8svcRWQ9vONA6Dg39F5ZNPHz3rA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König

> > The gpiod functions include variants for managed gpiod resources. Use it
> > to simplify the remove function.

> > As the driver handles a device node without a specification of dvs gpios
> > just fine, additionally use the variant of gpiod_get exactly for this
> > use case. This makes error checking more strict.

> > As a third benefit this patch makes the driver use the flags parameter
> > of gpiod_get* which will not be optional any more after 4.2 and so
> > prevents a build failure when the respective gpiod commit is merged.

> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Mark, please apply this.

...and reverted since it doesn't build as it's adding a use of a new API
which doesn't actually exist in Linus' tree yet (hopefully it's in
-next).  I need a tag to pull if I'm going to use this patch.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21  3:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-21  6:59 ` [PATCH] regulator: rk808: make better use of the gpiod API Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-21  9:56   ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-21 11:04     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-07-21 14:21       ` Uwe Kleine-König
     [not found]         ` <1437489985-1362-1-git-send-email-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
2015-07-21 14:46           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-22  2:21             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-21 13:09   ` [PATCH] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-21 14:35     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-21 14:41       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-22  0:13         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-22  7:13           ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150721110415.GS11162@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=zyw@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox