From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rk808: make better use of the gpiod API
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:21:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721142149.GC9981@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721110415.GS11162@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:04:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
>
> > > The gpiod functions include variants for managed gpiod resources. Use it
> > > to simplify the remove function.
>
> > > As the driver handles a device node without a specification of dvs gpios
> > > just fine, additionally use the variant of gpiod_get exactly for this
> > > use case. This makes error checking more strict.
>
> > > As a third benefit this patch makes the driver use the flags parameter
> > > of gpiod_get* which will not be optional any more after 4.2 and so
> > > prevents a build failure when the respective gpiod commit is merged.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > Mark, please apply this.
>
> ...and reverted since it doesn't build as it's adding a use of a new API
> which doesn't actually exist in Linus' tree yet (hopefully it's in
> -next). I need a tag to pull if I'm going to use this patch.
If you're refering to the build bot warning I got, too, then the problem
is just a missing #include and the problem existed already before e.g.
for gpiod_get_value with the .config used by the build bot.
In reply to this mail I'll send a fixup patch for the missing include
and a reworked version of my patch that fixes the reference leak pointed
out by Krzysztof Kozlowski.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 3:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-21 6:59 ` [PATCH] regulator: rk808: make better use of the gpiod API Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-21 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-21 11:04 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-21 14:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
[not found] ` <1437489985-1362-1-git-send-email-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
2015-07-21 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-22 2:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-21 13:09 ` [PATCH] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-21 14:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-21 14:41 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-22 0:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-22 7:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150721142149.GC9981@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zyw@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox