From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gross Subject: Re: next-20150806 build: 2 failures 52 warnings (next-20150806) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:50:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20150806185005.GA31045@qualcomm.com> References: <20150806171958.GZ20873@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49740 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754014AbbHFSuH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:50:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150806171958.GZ20873@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: Kumar Gala , David Brown , David Airlie , Rob Clark , jilai wang , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 12:00:47PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > Today's linux-next fails to build an arm64 allmodconfig due to: > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > ERROR: "qcom_scm_hdcp_req" [drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "qcom_scm_hdcp_available" [drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.ko] undefined! > > I'm not sure exactly where it crept in (I suspect it's an architecture > change) but I do note that there's no select for QCOM_SCM but it has no > config text. The arch/arm code does select that symbol but only in SMP > cases. I'll look into this. Thanks for the report. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project