From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:56:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20150807235656.GA9678@codeaurora.org> References: <20150727141117.1153348e@canb.auug.org.au> <20150803100825.GN16878@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:37318 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946411AbbHGX47 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:56:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150803100825.GN16878@atomide.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Turquette , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tero Kristo On 08/03, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Sorry for the delay in replying, I was offline for a few days. Thanks > for fixing it up. I assume no need to apply this fix into arm-soc > for-next but please let me know if you prefer that. > Can we apply it into arm-soc. I'm worried we're going to forget about it, and having the include there in arm-soc (where a3314e9cf69c isn't present) doesn't hurt anything from what I can tell. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project