From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Message-ID: <20151003142838.4bcd9570@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20150831074304.0ce16f9f@canb.auug.org.au> <20150901074033.4282c9c4@canb.auug.org.au> <20150914095425.1c6c3470@canb.auug.org.au> <20150915091030.13b2a149@canb.auug.org.au> <20150915091201.6d1f620b@canb.auug.org.au> <87vbappzob.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:45201 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750698AbbJCE2k (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2015 00:28:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vbappzob.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Yoshinori, On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:11:48 +0900 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:12:01 +0900, > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:10:30 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Please do "gitk 9751a9e449da..h8300-next" in your tree and look at > > > it (9751a9e449da is in Linus' tree). As I suggested above, maybe you > > > should go back to commit 99bcfda85f66 and work forward from there > > > (after amending it have a SOB). Or just start all over with v4.3 ... > > > > I meant v4.3-rc1, of course. > > OK. > fixed it. Well, not really :-( It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release. You should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other linux-next included branches (as long as that other branch is never rebased). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au