From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing in the s390 tree
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:43:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20151016094311.33ebf5fb@mschwide>
References: <20151016091733.30454691@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151016091733.30454691@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:17:33 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> 
> I noticed that the top commit
> 
>   748a000bdc07 ("s390/fpu: split fpu-internal.h into fpu internals, api, and type headers")
> 
> in the s390 tree has no Signed-off-by tag from you as committer ...
 
Oopsy.. fixed. Thanks for the hint.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.