From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 2
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:33:54 -0500
Message-ID: <20151102093354.3fd39d56@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20151102154017.6817486c@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20151102055816.GA434@swordfish>
	<20151102173023.52237c7f@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151102173023.52237c7f@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:30:23 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:


> So I guess I need that (or something similar) in linux-next until these
> trees are merged.
> 

Yeah, the fixup looks fine to me. It will be something that Linus will
need to do himself when he hits the conflict too.

-- Steve