From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:21:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20151203102132.GA15905@lst.de>
References: <20151202161936.22b23668cf9dea9872b5079b@kernel.org> <20151202164527.GA31048@lst.de> <565F5D96.5050902@kernel.dk> <565FFFA5.6000003@bjorling.me> <20151203090638.GA14329@lst.de> <566010EE.6050806@bjorling.me> <20151203095726.GA15428@lst.de> <566014BF.3080702@bjorling.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33951 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751549AbbLCKVf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:21:35 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <566014BF.3080702@bjorling.me>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Matias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rling?= <m@bjorling.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Matias Bj=F8rling wrote:
> Similar to this?

=46or the interface yes.  Now just get rid of using nvme_ns entirely -
seems like you just want ns_id and lba_shift, and those should fit
well into nvm_dev I think.