From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:18:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20160115151821.GE6330@kvack.org> References: <20160112164034.0fe945a7@canb.auug.org.au> <20160115073944.GA24382@infradead.org> <20160115202316.59601869@canb.auug.org.au> <20160115092531.GA3626@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160115092531.GA3626@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:25:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 08:23:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Via the aio tree (git://git.kvack.org/~bcrl/aio-next.git#master) added > > in July 2013 at Ben's request. The code was added to the aio tree in > > Jan 12 (my time), but has never been in a published linux-next tree due > > to the above build problem (I back out to the previous days version of > > the aio tree). > > Well, it's code Ben posted a few days ago, which to say it mildly is > rather controversial. It's cetainly not 4.5 material. It still needs the exposure. As for the build failure, it's a bug in the arch __get_user() implementation that needs to be fixed. __get_user() should really be able to handle 64 bit types. -ben > > -- > > Cheers, > > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > ---end quoted text--- -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now."